![]() |
We saw these on Whats-app groups...are they back??? |
ARE YOU CONSCIOUS THAT 2008 is
BACK? A
few signs have been recorded in the streets of Zimbabwe to prove that we are
back to that year we all hated. Prices of goods have been going up, queues
reappeared in banks, strikes have been seen, unemployment is total, and
finally, those notes that are not tender beyond our borders are back. We have
been collecting peoples’ reactions to this thing.
Our Thando says, “Why
are we caught in the 20th century creating notes when we can digitalize all
transactions? The government should just stop trying, this is the result of the
rule of old people, and they should just start investing in innovation.”
“I
cannot believe that we live on a Beta version of a country forever. All things
are just trial and error, at the end it’s the citizens who suffer”…I say.
WE GOT AFRAID when we heard that
the Minister of State security is ready to go to war for the “pledge”. Not that
we care much of religious choices but for a whole minister who didn’t go to war
when we lost $15 billion to tell the nation that, we say this is evidence of
misplaced priorities. Hope it ends only on headlines, you can fancy to read it
here… http://goo.gl/TiRnz4
ON BOND NOTES; The former Minister of Finance, the man who at least did not
fail in a five year term to hold the finance gears properly had this to say on
the introduction of Bond Notes…. The return of the Zimbabwean dollar
marks the gross admission by this regime that it has failed and failed in
absolute terms and that it will drag every one along in the plunge to abyss
that now awaits this economy.
It is a cynical, disrespectful and
contemptuous move that has absolutely no logic, sense or justification on any
rational ground whatsoever.
A national currency at the end of the day is
a relationship that captures the country s productive capacity. It reflects a
country s output and the strength, quantity and quality of its real economy.
Indeed in the narrow sense the currency is no
more a reflection of the interface between a country s exports and its imports.
In short, a country s currency is easily a reflection of its current account or
trade position.
Thus countries with strong economies that
export a lot and therefore enjoy trade surpluses will tend to have strong and
stable currencies.
This is the reality of modern day currencies
that are no longer backed by gold reserves since the seventies.
In this regard to the extent that Zimbabwe s
productive capacity is near to zero, it cannot afford as yet to bring back its
currency.
Since 2012 GDP growth has been on a down ward
spiral with growth in 2015 standing at -1, 8 % and -3.8% in 2016.
In this same period capacity utilization has
collapsed to 15 % of 2013 levels whilst the economy has witnessed massive
deindustrialization.
The same period has also seen more than 6000
companies shut down and at least 300 000 workers losing their jobs.
That output has collapsed is reflected in the
trade account, where the current account deficit, even by conservative IMF
estimates now stands at -15.2 % of GDP in 2014 and a projected -10.3 % in 2015.
Zimbabwe is effectively a supermarket economy
consuming goods produced in other countries. In 2014 its exports were $3.7
billion against imports of $6,3 billion.2015 was no better. Exports were $3.2
billion against imports of $6, 03 billion.
The bottom line is that Zimbabwe does not
have the requisite export base to support a currency. More accurately the
country simply does not have a trade balance to even think of bringing the
Zimbabwean dollar.
Any currency too needs credible reserves
financing the balance of payment to back it. Zimbabwe has a mere $303 million
in reserve being amounts left in reserve as SDRs by the inclusive government
.That amount represents a mere four weeks of import cover.
But a currency is a measure and indicator of
the existence or otherwise of a social contract. A currency reflects in part
the respect and confidence that the citizen has in the state or government.
In this regard countries with contested
legitimacy tend to suffer invariable currency collapses. An abused citizen
simply rejects the authority of the state and the local currency becomes an
immediate causality.
The Zimbabwean dollar suffered this fate in
2007.The Zimbabwean public displayed its loss of affection and belief in the
Government by ejectment of the dollar. Similar de-legitimization has occurred
across the globe particularly in Latin American banana republics including
Argentina.
The Zimbabwean citizen long ago jettisoned
this regime and its currency. It will not accept this new dollar just like it
rejected the old dollar.
Indeed the reintroduction of the dollar will
have cataleptic consequences to the remaining constructs of Zimbabwe s pseudo
economy.
It is a decision that will see many of the
remaining companies reach breaking point and simply shut down. Few are prepared
to relive the nightmare of the melt down period of 2007 and 2008.
The move will also engineer a fresh wave of
externalization, under banking, tax avoidance and evasion.
Whenever States cross the line and act
illegally, even if within the law the citizen s innocent activities become
criminalized. Rule by the law does not work and simply invites breach. The
citizen disengages and reorganizes its affairs to protect itself.
The directive that forty percent of bank
deposits starting from 5 May will now be converted to the South African Rand is
blatantly unconstitutional and must be challenged in the courts.
It amounts to a devaluation of the US dollar
by at least 20 % in real terms given the volatility of the rand.
The move will leave a desperate work force
already hit with low disposable income further impoverished.
The return of the Zimbabwean dollar is thus a
stark reminder that this is a rogue regime that cannot be trusted and is not
capable of reform.
The hope is that those, who have been running
around like headless chickens, flaunting their skirts and high heels batting
for this regime, must take a deep breath and make a strategic retreat.
Perhaps the burning question of the day, is
why has the regime embarked on such a bizarre reckless act.
The answer is that the regime has run out of options.
It has basically run out of cash .It faces
huge fiscal pressures and a ballooning budget deficit that it has so far
financed through the issuance of toxic treasury bills, which have now reached a
saturation point.
The regime is failing to cover recurrent
expenditure and has accumulated huge domestic arrears from 2015, including
unpaid pensions and bonuses.
More decisively the regime has created a huge
gap in RTGS balances that have been raided at the Central Bank. That gap is the
real cause of the current cash crises.
Reintroducing the Zimbabwe dollar will allow
the responsible thieves to monetize this gap in the new Zimbabwean dollar.
Reintroducing the dollar will also allow ZANU
elites, including the first family, who are drowning in domestic debt to clean
their balance sheets using both the Zim dollar, a feat that ZAMCO is failing to
do effectively.
Besides with an election less than twenty
months away, ZANU desperately needs resources to monetize and actualize its
insatiable election promises.
So once again a country s fate and direction
founds itself held to ransom by the short term interests of a narrow rogue
element supported by a selfish sect of imperial Europe.
THIS TIME AROUND, IT IS TIME FOR THE CITIZEN
TO BE ANGRY.
MAYBE YOU WERE WONDERING who Tendai Laxton Biti is. Here you go, Biti (born 6 August
1966) is a Zimbabwean politician who served as Zimbabwe's Minister
of Finance from 2009 to 2013. He was the Secretary-General of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC-Tsvangirai)
political party and a member of Parliament for Harare East until
he was expelled from the party and recalled from parliament in mid-2014.
You can read this post on Tendai Biti’s
Facebook wall at https://goo.gl/Ax6h4O
PS: We did not call the Reserve Bank Governor; we
assumed he is busy already trying to convince everyone that the bond notes will
work.